Author: WildThang

Log message: After discussion wit Bleep, due to the amount of controversy
we'll put this back.  I guess if the admins/opers feel strong enough that
wallops are being abused, they can put forth a CFV or something to either
fix the operators, or change wallops however is decided. I still encourage
the patch bleep wrote for use with other networks as an option. We'll leave
it such that by default, it doesnt change the behavior of wallops.
 Signed.... "The Threat to Undernet" *grin*. Damn I'm in a good mood today.

git-svn-id: file:///home/klmitch/undernet-ircu/undernet-ircu-svn/ircu2/trunk@15 c9e4aea6-c8fd-4c43-8297-357d70d61c8c

diff --git a/ircd/send.c b/ircd/send.c
index 1b5d035f41a4671c341a25a2ac992d40459a6f78..3c4e73e281e1835bc1552ef8a220a115c983df55 100644 (file)
--- a/ircd/send.c
+++ b/ircd/send.c
@@ -782,8 +782,8 @@ void sendto_ops_butone(aClient *one, aClient *from, char *pattern, ...)
   ++sentalong_marker;
   for (cptr = client; cptr; cptr = cptr->next)
   {
-    /* if (!SendWallops(cptr)) */
-    if (!IsAnOper(cptr))
+    /*if (!IsAnOper(cptr)) */
+    if (!SendWallops(cptr))
       continue;
     i = cptr->from->fd;                /* find connection oper is on */
     if (sentalong[i] == sentalong_marker)      /* sent message along it already ? */